A GUIDE TO SPOTTING AI-GENERATED IMAGES
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have progressed rapidly since their public release in August 2022. Looking for weird, distorted body parts is no longer a reliable way to spot AI-generated images. Many of the latest AI-generated images are nearly indistinguishable from human-created art.
This post serves as a guide to help you determine whether someone is using AI to create their artwork, even if they claim they are not. While there are ethical concerns regarding the LAION data set used to train many AI/ML systems and copyright issues for end users, I can find some level of respect for those who declare that they have used AI/ML in their work. This transparency allows clients to make informed decisions about how they spend their money.
It’s important to note that this is intended for use when comparing against publicly available generative systems. It's possible that better models trained on specific data and used on private iterations of this technology may be more specialized and therefore more advanced.
A SUDDEN appearance
A BEVY OF FINALIZED CONCEPTS
A BEVY OF FINALIZED CONCEPTS
The portfolio is a new account created within the last 9 months (since August 2022), yet it is filled with a large quantity of artwork.
A BEVY OF FINALIZED CONCEPTS
A BEVY OF FINALIZED CONCEPTS
A BEVY OF FINALIZED CONCEPTS
The portfolio contains highly detailed "concept" artwork that is clustered in groups, indicating that the person may be using AI to generate multiple versions of the same concept. This is a major tell for pages that share things like “stained glass bathtubs”, which all look very similar because they were generated quickly for engagement.
A WAVE OF UPLOADS
A BEVY OF FINALIZED CONCEPTS
EVERYBODY GETS A STYLE!
There are frequent uploads of many images per day, every day, which is not possible for a traditional artist to produce. Furthermore, many of these images will be very similar and look finished, as highlighted in the point before.
EVERYBODY GETS A STYLE!
001100010010011110100001101101110
EVERYBODY GETS A STYLE!
The styles used in the artwork differ greatly across the entire portfolio, indicating that the grifter may be using AI/ML to replicate the styles of various artists to maximize exposure and possible sales. This is possible since it’s so easy to replicate via AI by simply saying “in the style of {a named artist}”.
001100010010011110100001101101110
001100010010011110100001101101110
001100010010011110100001101101110
The public file or image names will contain or solely be a long string of numbers, letters, or a combination of both. This is because the grifter is generating so many images that they have no time to rename them all. This is not referring to the actual link or URL, which may have such long strings of text and numbers.
Source: @anotherlizard
A PEEK BEHIND THE CURTAIN
001100010010011110100001101101110
001100010010011110100001101101110
If the image is photorealistic, looking at the metadata on their website will let you check on image creation dates, copyright, and/or camera settings. This only works if the metadata is not stripped (like it is when images are posted to Facebook, Instagram, etc).
BLATANT Copyright Infringement
BLATANT Copyright Infringement
BLATANT Copyright Infringement
This goes without saying.
PROPORTIONS & Dynamics
The Curse of the SAME FACE
The Curse of the SAME FACE
In AI-generated art, figures tend to have exaggerated features such as musculature, buttocks, and bosoms. The skin is often very smooth with wrinkles being the only exception (those are usually overly defined). Women are mostly portrayed in a sexualized, anime-style manner rather than a more empowering one.
AI art also lacks any sense of cohesive action and is usually restricted to stiff, stylized poses from the front, side, or at a slight angle.
The Curse of the SAME FACE
The Curse of the SAME FACE
The Curse of the SAME FACE
Oftentimes, AI art will generate the same face, likely caused by its recurrence within the original data set.
Tone
The Curse of the SAME FACE
Lack of order and precision
Many AI images have an artificial sheen that gives them a surreal, almost “Hollywood” glamour. They could be considered “too perfect”.
Lack of order and precision
Lack of full, continuous patterns
Lack of order and precision
AI-generated art often lacks intent and purpose, with elements being placed randomly throughout the image without much precision.
Lack of full, continuous patterns
Lack of full, continuous patterns
Lack of full, continuous patterns
AI-generated patterns tend to be “chunky”, especially in fabrics, resulting in sections that do not bear repeating patterns well or segments where patterns rapidly change. This can also be seen in clothing where buttons suddenly melt into the fabric or other inconsistencies.
Lack of symmetry
Lack of full, continuous patterns
Lack of full, continuous patterns
AI often fails to achieve artistic precision with symmetrical elements, as seen in “themed” rooms or architectural renderings.
Lack of correct perspective
Lack of correct perspective
Lack of correct perspective
Architectural AI often lacks proper perspective, with windows not matching the perspective lines of walls, countertops not aligning, etc.
Lack of closed curves
Lack of correct perspective
Lack of correct perspective
AI-generated jewelry such as necklaces and bracelets may be lopsided or one-sided.
REFLECTIONS & LIGHT
Lack of correct perspective
REFLECTIONS & LIGHT
AI artwork tends to have reflections and lighting that don't match the surroundings. Remember the process stabilizes noise and is not an actual ray-traced render.
STRANGE Tattoos
lorem ipsum and whatnot
REFLECTIONS & LIGHT
AI generated tattoos are oftentimes imprecise, overly complicated “blobs”. Tribal artwork is often found due to its more simplistic form, though as previously mentioned AI has trouble with closed curves and patterns.
lorem ipsum and whatnot
lorem ipsum and whatnot
lorem ipsum and whatnot
AI cannot currently generate legible text, such as the patch on his arm.
Body horror
lorem ipsum and whatnot
lorem ipsum and whatnot
While this is becoming less common with each new iteration of generative software, hasty AI users may overlook disturbing and surreal elements in their images such as hands.
I hope this guide has been helpful in identifying potential AI/ML grifters. However, as AI technology advances, and as you’ve seen in some of my examples, it’s getting very hard to tell.
It's important to note that if someone declares their use of AI/ML, it's their choice, and if someone is willing to pay the same amount for an artwork generated in seconds versus one that took days to create, that's also their decision.
My goal with this guide is to provide a useful tool for those considering purchasing artwork from someone who has not declared their use of AI/ML or refuses to do so.
OTHER EXAMPLES OF AI-GENERATED IMAGES
